Blog

Go to YouTube right now and start typing "how to make YouTube Shorts from..." and watch what autocompletes.

I searched "YouTube tags" this week and the autocomplete finished my sentence with "2025" before I even got there.

You filmed twelve Shorts on Sunday.

I keep thinking about a small thing YouTube did recently.

TLDR: Scheduling YouTube Shorts does not lower your views - the algorithm treats a scheduled Short identically to one you post manually.

TLDR: Opus Clip frustrates creators less because of the price and more because of a credit system that meters your usage and a model where you own nothing.

A while back I added up the time I spend on the stuff that happens AFTER a video is made.

The video is done. You hit stop on the recording, cut the rough edit, exported the file. That should be the hard part. It never is.

For five years I ignored Shorts completely. 39 subscribers, views in the teens per video. Then I started posting them on a schedule and everything changed.

For five years I ran a YouTube channel without thumbnails. Not bad thumbnails. No thumbnails. I let YouTube pick a random frame and called it done.

If you record a podcast and don't put it on YouTube, you're leaving your biggest distribution channel empty. Here's how to compress the repurposing to 30 minutes.

YouTube's search algorithm reads your content differently than it did two years ago. The platform has shifted from matching keywords to understanding meaning. That change has broken a lot of old SEO advice.

Film four videos before lunch. Package all four by dinner. Walk away with a month of content scheduled and uploading automatically across the next four weeks.

Most creators treat Shorts as separate productions. The better approach is to mine your existing long-form videos. The best 30 seconds are already in the footage.